review and criticism of pierre bourdieu's theory based on the sadraee wisdom

at first, this article explained the theoretical foundations of sadraee wisdom as a criterion for evaluation, then; it discussed the bourdieu’s intellectual system and then is criticized his approach. in discussing the theoretical foundations of authenticity of individual and society, substantial motion, human truth, knowledge, integration and development-oriented nature based on sadra’s point of view are expressed. however, some of the issues that are addressed in bourdieu’s critical approach are: trying to eliminate the false opposition between objectivism and subjectivism; the study of second nature and sociologists’ experience in different fields of study as a scientific and academic world; social actors are known as those who follow reasoning, not those who are condemn to mechanical forces and self-aware selectors and believed that second nature is shaped within the space and fields; and fields are structures where strategies and fights are occurred within them. according to bourdieu, the modernization is the process of differentiation and legal, political, intellectual, artistic, and etc self-independence (the narrow domain) from more areas of public power (wider domain)some of the subjects that are considered in bourdieu's critique include the inability to integrate agency-structure, incomplete understanding of traditional and modern society and logic of behavior in these communities, and offering a way to obviate determinism and social properties. finally, it has been tried to present a more accurate report of the process of human society development by providing identity-environment theory, overcoming emotions, overcoming social belonging, rational selection, and presenting movement of individual and society model.